72 Hour Transparency Call Is Right For Any Bill
By Justin Gardner | Related entries in Congress, Democrats, Health Care, TransparencyRegardless of what you think about the current health care legislation being debated on Capitol Hill, being able to read it before it goes to the floor for a vote is the right thing to do and I’m glad to see a Senator from Missouri calling for it.
But will the Dems listen?
As the health care reform bill moves to the Senate floor, a key bloc of moderate Senate Democrats and an independent called on Senate Majority Leader Reid to increase the process’ transparency.Specifically, the senators called on Reid to post legislative text and CBO scores online 72 hours before the first floor vote. They asked that all amendments be posted before debate begins. And the amended bill and CBO score should be posted three days before a final Senate vote and before the Senate votes on a conference committee report.
Democratic Sens. Blanche Lincoln, Evan Bayh, Mary Landrieu, Claire McCaskill, Ben Nelson, Mark Pryor, Jim Webb and Independent Sen. Joe Lieberman signed the letter.
“As their democratically-elected representatives in Washington, D.C., it is our duty to listen to their concerns and to provide them with the chance to respond to proposals that will impact their lives,” the senators wrote. “At a time when trust in Congress and the U.S. government is unprecedentedly low, we can begin to rebuild the American people’s faith in their federal government through transparency and by actively inviting Americans to participate in the legislative process.”
Simply put, this administration promised transparency and they should push the Congress to deliver…especially with legislation this contentious. Because it’ll expose anything truly controversial and save a lot of headaches in the long run.
Anybody disagree?
Related Posts
This entry was posted on Tuesday, October 6th, 2009 and is filed under Congress, Democrats, Health Care, Transparency. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


October 6th, 2009 at 9:43 pm
President Obama promised us 120 hours.
October 6th, 2009 at 9:44 pm
I completely agree.
October 7th, 2009 at 1:02 am
Which is, you must admit, more than what former President Bush ever provided us.
October 7th, 2009 at 6:20 am
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Open Government SC. Open Government SC said: @Donklephant blog: 72-hour wait would aid transparency -http://bit.ly/A2U28 [...]
October 7th, 2009 at 8:20 am
I love this idea, but I worry that 72 hours is just long enough for detractors of a bill to go pull out, misinterpret, and publicize the “death panels” section, but not long enough for supporters to respond with the truth. I think 120 hours would be better.
October 7th, 2009 at 11:23 am
The transparency of legislation under the Dems and Obama to date is on par with Bush…
Promises are cheap.
October 7th, 2009 at 12:29 pm
I think the Dems will listen because it’s Dems who are making the call. It’s long been clear that no bill passes without the bloc of moderate Dems in the Senate on board. The GOP can bitch and snipe from the sidelines but these eight Dem Senators and as many as six or seven others are the crucial votes.
October 8th, 2009 at 9:02 pm
I hope this bill does some good.