Who’s kidding who?

By Jacob | Related entries in Barack, Democrats, News, Republicans

JinBmore tells me what I don’t want to hear:

I have two words for you: “President Bachmann”. They laughed about Reagan the same way they do about her.

My immediate feeling is that independents and centrists will never vote for her and they will decide the 2012 election.

After some consideration it seems that less-informed, conservative-leaning Independents might vote for her based on her Establishment creds (she’s been a Congresswoman since 2006), and well-informed, moderate Republicans might just ignore the Tea Party business, bite the bullet and vote for her.

She’s the only candidate thus far with a legitimate foot in each camp.

Great. Now I’m scared for America again.


This entry was posted on Thursday, July 7th, 2011 and is filed under Barack, Democrats, News, Republicans. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

8 Responses to “Who’s kidding who?”

  1. cranky critter Says:

    Out of her league. Not up to the task. Bit of a lightweight.

    Won’t win. Not even the GOP nom.

    But inevitably, she’s ticketed to be overplumped simply on the basis of the celebrity of her interestingness as deemed by the internet. Anti-Backman LW hate will fuel a longer and higher rise than otherwise, and she’ll likely steal support from Ron Paul while becoming the favorite of the tea party and socon right.

    Perry’s the one to watch.

  2. gerryf Says:

    Oh yeah, I can hardly wait to vote a man for president who only a year ago wanted to secede and then last month crept out of the state without telling anyone while his state was burning so he could meet with a cabal of billionaires to plan ways to destroy the middle class.

    Perfect president.

  3. Jim S Says:

    I think she could get the Republican nomination. So could Perry. I don’t think either one would win the general election.

  4. kranky kritter Says:

    Gerry, it’s great to know that you’ve already got a nicely budding seedling of an anti-Perry rant. I’m sure you’ll have it embellished to 3 full grafs of bile by fall.

    But my comment was not an endorsement, it’s merely an observation. I don’t support Perry, I expect to vote for Obama again.

    This stuff about how Perry “wanted to secede” is pure idiocy by the way. No surprise you’re sporting i of course, but I saw the clip on which it was based. There’s nothing to it beyond a touch of light, clever pandering.

  5. Jacob Says:

    Gerry, I have to agree that Kranky wasn’t endorsing Perry – he was merely saying that he’s the one to watch.

    Kranky and Gerry – you’re feud is silly and it’s been pretty amped up as of late. Should we schedule a death match to settle things permanently?

  6. Jacob Says:

    *your

  7. Mike A. Says:

    Agree with Jacob…Prepare the Octagon!

  8. kranky kritter Says:

    You guys KNOW I’m always ready to reply substantively when given the opportunity.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: