Specter to Challenge Signing Statements

By Dyre42 | Related entries in General Politics, Law, Legislation, Supreme Court

Sen. Specter Readies Bill to Sue Bush
A powerful Republican committee chairman who has led the fight against President Bush’s signing statements said Monday he would have a bill ready by the end of the week allowing Congress to sue him in federal court.
“We will submit legislation to the United States Senate which will…authorize the Congress to undertake judicial review of those signing statements with the view to having the president’s acts declared unconstitutional,” Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter, R-Pa., said on the Senate floor.

Specter’s announcement came the same day that an American Bar Association task force concluded that by attaching conditions to legislation, the president has sidestepped his constitutional duty to either sign a bill, veto it, or take no action. More

Given Specter’s previous lackluster attempt to reign in the administration’s expansion of executive power will this legislation also prove to be all bark and no bite? Additionally should this bill pass will it do so by a significant enough margin to avoid what could be the President’s second veto?

Cross posted at Dyre Portents


This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 25th, 2006 and is filed under General Politics, Law, Legislation, Supreme Court. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “Specter to Challenge Signing Statements”

  1. David Says:

    Great… more legal wrangling between the branches. :(

  2. DosPeros Says:

    Bush’s signing statement on Specter’s Bill: To be enforced in full force and effect no sooner than three years from the date of signing.

  3. Eclectic Floridian Says:

    DosPeros;

    This will be a bill that needs no signing statement.

    Now that Specter has made the “tough talk” headlines, the bill will say:

    - Past signing statements are retroactively legal
    - Future signing statements shall be enforeced as if they were part of the original bill
    - Further legislation regarding signing statements will have no force or effect

    That’s his record. When Specter puts up an anti-Bush bill, you can guarantee that it’s effect will be zero, a simple waste of time.

  4. sid davisson Says:

    I cannot accept executive orders or signing statements as legitimate forms of law or legislation.They appear to circumvent constitutional restrictions dealing with the separation of powers.They appear to be blatant authoritarian dictatorship.All must be expunged immediately.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: