Comments on: Your Mail Is Officially Not Safe http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/ Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable. Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:39:23 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Jeff http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/comment-page-3/#comment-190348 Jeff Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:56:16 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/#comment-190348 Activist, keep thinking for yourself. It's great to see. Mark said: "haha america is a police state! you voted the neocons in - now you have to live with it! stupid bloody americans! shut up or you won’t get any pudding. " this one made me laugh! Activist, keep thinking for yourself. It’s great to see.

Mark said: “haha america is a police state!
you voted the neocons in – now you have to live with it!
stupid bloody americans! shut up or you won’t get any pudding. ”

this one made me laugh!

]]> By: Doc http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/comment-page-3/#comment-179971 Doc Mon, 08 Jan 2007 05:20:50 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/#comment-179971 Don't think it will be over in '08 thats when you will get your National ID card. Don’t think it will be over in ‘08 thats when you will get your National ID card.

]]> By: jimbow8 http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/comment-page-3/#comment-178126 jimbow8 Sat, 06 Jan 2007 16:21:06 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/#comment-178126 You're right, they aren't technically laws. They are explanations on how the Executive Branch is planning to interpret and enforce the laws. You’re right, they aren’t technically laws.

They are explanations on how the Executive Branch is planning to interpret and enforce the laws.

]]> By: ACTIVIST http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/comment-page-2/#comment-177307 ACTIVIST Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:37:03 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/#comment-177307 Final post: I guess I wasn't the troll. It's been fun. Final post: I guess I wasn’t the troll. It’s been fun.

]]> By: MellowBox » Briefgeheimnis? Nicht mit uns! http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/comment-page-2/#comment-176831 MellowBox » Briefgeheimnis? Nicht mit uns! Fri, 05 Jan 2007 10:46:46 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/#comment-176831 [...] Donklephant - Your mail is officially not safe Telepolis - Bush hebelt Breifgeheimnis aus [...] [...] Donklephant – Your mail is officially not safe Telepolis – Bush hebelt Breifgeheimnis aus [...]

]]> By: MellowBox » Briefgeheimnis? Nicht mit uns! http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/comment-page-2/#comment-176832 MellowBox » Briefgeheimnis? Nicht mit uns! Fri, 05 Jan 2007 10:46:28 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/#comment-176832 [...] Donklephant - Your mail is officially not safe Telepolis - Bush hebelt Breifgeheimnis aus [...] [...] Donklephant – Your mail is officially not safe Telepolis – Bush hebelt Breifgeheimnis aus [...]

]]> By: MellowBox » Briefgeheimnis? Nicht mit uns! http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/comment-page-2/#comment-176833 MellowBox » Briefgeheimnis? Nicht mit uns! Fri, 05 Jan 2007 10:46:04 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/#comment-176833 [...] Donklephant - Your mail is officially not safe Telepolis - Bush hebelt Breifgeheimnis aus [...] [...] Donklephant – Your mail is officially not safe Telepolis – Bush hebelt Breifgeheimnis aus [...]

]]> By: ACTIVIST http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/comment-page-2/#comment-176606 ACTIVIST Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:24:03 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/#comment-176606 Hey Grunt, I like your thinking. How many times have libs said "I'm going to move" and then not lived up to it. You have some superior genes there friend, and I like the way you think. Semper Fi. Hey Grunt, I like your thinking. How many times have libs said “I’m going to move” and then not lived up to it. You have some superior genes there friend, and I like the way you think. Semper Fi.

]]> By: Brad Karn USMC Ret. http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/comment-page-2/#comment-176588 Brad Karn USMC Ret. Thu, 04 Jan 2007 23:15:14 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/#comment-176588 If you people don't want protection for your family's and children from the terrorist, then you ought to move to Iraq or Iran. Leave our president alone. he is doing a better job of protecting us than anyone has in a long time. Mark my words President Bush will go down in history as one of the greatest presidents of our time, regardless what all the American haters say!!! Brad Karn USMC Ret. If you people don’t want protection for your family’s and children from the terrorist, then you ought to move to Iraq or Iran. Leave our president alone. he is doing a better job of protecting us than anyone has in a long time. Mark my words President Bush will go down in history as one of the greatest presidents of our time, regardless what all the American haters say!!! Brad Karn USMC Ret.

]]> By: Bush Decides He Can Open Your Mail Without Warrant | Outlaw News http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/comment-page-2/#comment-176520 Bush Decides He Can Open Your Mail Without Warrant | Outlaw News Thu, 04 Jan 2007 21:26:07 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/#comment-176520 [...] • Justin Gardner at Donklephant said Dec. 30 that “Bush has created hundreds of de facto “laws” that nobody has to approve and few even know about. This … just seems flat out wrong.” [...] [...] • Justin Gardner at Donklephant said Dec. 30 that “Bush has created hundreds of de facto “laws” that nobody has to approve and few even know about. This … just seems flat out wrong.” [...]

]]> By: DosPeros http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/comment-page-2/#comment-176343 DosPeros Thu, 04 Jan 2007 18:25:03 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/#comment-176343 You are absolutely correct DosPeros, but sometimes it is fun to sit back and watch the manufactured outrage and fear. I had started to write a comment on this post several days ago, but I didn't I really want to interrupt the flow of the legally delusional vomitarium. But here is another news flash: Bush Administration has recently declared that police can enter your house without a search warrant if there are exigent circumstances! Bastards... You are absolutely correct DosPeros, but sometimes it is fun to sit back and watch the manufactured outrage and fear. I had started to write a comment on this post several days ago, but I didn’t I really want to interrupt the flow of the legally delusional vomitarium.

But here is another news flash: Bush Administration has recently declared that police can enter your house without a search warrant if there are exigent circumstances! Bastards…

]]> By: Big Dog http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/comment-page-2/#comment-176211 Big Dog Thu, 04 Jan 2007 14:12:48 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/#comment-176211 What the hell is everyone ranting about. This isn't Bush - this is the constitution. Incoming mail from foriegn origin has been inspected for over two hundred years! Customs (now a branch of Homeland Sec) has every right to do this in order to protect both the citizens from harm, and ensure that customs duties are properly collected - you know, prevent smuggling. Its so obvious that Bush-haters will jump at anything to express their contempt for him. This "law" has been around forever - blame Jefferson, Madison, et al if you want to get so excited about this. What the hell is everyone ranting about. This isn’t Bush – this is the constitution. Incoming mail from foriegn origin has been inspected for over two hundred years! Customs (now a branch of Homeland Sec) has every right to do this in order to protect both the citizens from harm, and ensure that customs duties are properly collected – you know, prevent smuggling. Its so obvious that Bush-haters will jump at anything to express their contempt for him. This “law” has been around forever – blame Jefferson, Madison, et al if you want to get so excited about this.

]]> By: ACTIVIST http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/comment-page-2/#comment-174788 ACTIVIST Tue, 02 Jan 2007 23:07:57 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/#comment-174788 Senator: Respectable post. I absolutely love when we can have respectable debate. Unfortunately, that is not generally the rule. But I do appreciate someone who can articulate our differences as you have, even if you are on the other side of the isle. In my experience, most libs can't debate, or won't debate, and I find the reason for that is basically, they are uninformed. They just want to spout the party line, but then can't back it up since it was not their original thought. Most are libs because Mom & Dad were, or they belong to a union and feel that they have to be. I am in one of the largest unions in the nation, but I am able to see the issues clearly, and able to make up my own mind. 40% of union members vote republican. My union has told me for 20 years now, that if I don't vote democrat, my job will disappear. I bought it for a while, but after 20 years, I still have a job, and plenty of security. Nice talking to ya. I really agree with your last sentence. Semper fi Senator: Respectable post. I absolutely love when we can have respectable debate. Unfortunately, that is not generally the rule. But I do appreciate someone who can articulate our differences as you have, even if you are on the other side of the isle. In my experience, most libs can’t debate, or won’t debate, and I find the reason for that is basically, they are uninformed. They just want to spout the party line, but then can’t back it up since it was not their original thought.
Most are libs because Mom & Dad were, or they belong to a union and feel that they have to be.
I am in one of the largest unions in the nation, but I am able to see the issues clearly, and able to make up my own mind. 40% of union members vote republican. My union has told me for 20 years now, that if I don’t vote democrat, my job will disappear. I bought it for a while, but after 20 years, I still have a job, and plenty of security. Nice talking to ya. I really agree with your last sentence. Semper fi

]]> By: Postman http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/comment-page-2/#comment-174690 Postman Tue, 02 Jan 2007 21:10:14 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/#comment-174690 It is time for another Boston Tea Party! It is time for another Boston Tea Party!

]]> By: Postman http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/comment-page-2/#comment-174661 Postman Tue, 02 Jan 2007 20:51:05 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/#comment-174661 This is just flat out wrong!!! Bush hijacks any legistlation with his hidden agendas. Just like the "No Child Left Behind" legistaltion that he inserted wordage to allow recruiters to freely enter schools for recruiting purposes w/o school permission or parental permission. Bush is a frig'n loon and seems to enjoy destroying our civil liberties, moving total power to the military, and creating unwarranted wars. Striking resemblence to a dictator! This is just flat out wrong!!! Bush hijacks any legistlation with his hidden agendas. Just like the “No Child Left Behind” legistaltion that he inserted wordage to allow recruiters to freely enter schools for recruiting purposes w/o school permission or parental permission.

Bush is a frig’n loon and seems to enjoy destroying our civil liberties, moving total power to the military, and creating unwarranted wars. Striking resemblence to a dictator!

]]> By: Senator http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/comment-page-2/#comment-174306 Senator Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:21:06 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/#comment-174306 Activist, I must respond to your last post with which I wholeheartedly (and respectfully) disagree. First of all, I think it would be impossible to determine just how some foreign leader or terrorist might have voted in our election in 2004. It could be rightly stated, given your "guess" that both Hitler and Mussolinni would have most likely voted for President Bush given several areas of commonality. Secondly, I think it tries to paint those of us who voted for Senator Kerry with the same brush that is saved for "those who hate America." The underlying theme is clear: the terrorists hate us, as do the "libs," as you put it. For goodness sake, a book you recommended was entitled "Why the Left Hates America" by Dan Flynn. I believe that these vicious characterizations really do nothing to elevate the level of the debate, nor create an atmosphere that engenders harmonious negotiation. Now, Activist I realize you're not alone. Many on my side of the aisle are just as bad. However, we have much more in common with one another than that which separates us. Activist,
I must respond to your last post with which I wholeheartedly (and respectfully) disagree. First of all, I think it would be impossible to determine just how some foreign leader or terrorist might have voted in our election in 2004. It could be rightly stated, given your “guess” that both Hitler and Mussolinni would have most likely voted for President Bush given several areas of commonality.
Secondly, I think it tries to paint those of us who voted for Senator Kerry with the same brush that is saved for “those who hate America.” The underlying theme is clear: the terrorists hate us, as do the “libs,” as you put it. For goodness sake, a book you recommended was entitled “Why the Left Hates America” by Dan Flynn.
I believe that these vicious characterizations really do nothing to elevate the level of the debate, nor create an atmosphere that engenders harmonious negotiation. Now, Activist I realize you’re not alone. Many on my side of the aisle are just as bad. However, we have much more in common with one another than that which separates us.

]]> By: Activist http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/comment-page-2/#comment-173402 Activist Tue, 02 Jan 2007 00:13:09 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/#comment-173402 OK, your turn Infragable Crunk: Sorry to disappoint you, but I am a troll, kinda. I am a Post Office employee who stumbled onto this article out of curiosity. But I am also a retired Marine, and NEVER walk away from a good fight, especially with a lib. So lets get down to it. I never went to college. I am a little old high school graduate. I think CLEARLY, for myself, and don't just follow the party line. That is what libs do mostly. For instance, I am opposed to the way immigration and our borders are being handled. I say we turn the entire border with Mexico into a military base, and keep ILLEGALS from crossing. You could say that removing Clinton made the Nation weaker if you want to, the FACTS are that we were attacked MANY times during his watch. MANY more times (excuding Iraq) than we have under President George W. Bush's watch. Your logic is flawed but I am not surprised. So let me try some. Who do you think Huessain, Kadafy, OBL, Alzerkowi, and the like would have voted for in 04? Bush, or Kerry? If you can't answer this one honestly, then your LOGIC is permanently flawed. Of course they wanted Kerry. That chicken little piece of crap would have put us back in the closet (my previous post) with our tails between our legs, free for them to plan another attack. If you don't believe me, as Netentyahou from Israel. Nice talking to you. Now go read a book, and make up your own mind. " Why the Left Hates America" - Dan Flynn, is one of the best I have read lately. OK, your turn Infragable Crunk: Sorry to disappoint you, but I am a troll, kinda. I am a Post Office employee who stumbled onto this article out of curiosity. But I am also a retired Marine, and NEVER walk away from a good fight, especially with a lib. So lets get down to it.
I never went to college. I am a little old high school graduate. I think CLEARLY, for myself, and don’t just follow the party line. That is what libs do mostly. For instance, I am opposed to the way immigration and our borders are being handled. I say we turn the entire border with Mexico into a military base, and keep ILLEGALS from crossing. You could say that removing Clinton made the Nation weaker if you want to, the FACTS are that we were attacked MANY times during his watch. MANY more times (excuding Iraq) than we have under President George W. Bush’s watch. Your logic is flawed but I am not surprised. So let me try some. Who do you think Huessain, Kadafy, OBL, Alzerkowi, and the like would have voted for in 04? Bush, or Kerry? If you can’t answer this one honestly, then your LOGIC is permanently flawed. Of course they wanted Kerry. That chicken little piece of crap would have put us back in the closet (my previous post) with our tails between our legs, free for them to plan another attack. If you don’t believe me, as Netentyahou from Israel. Nice talking to you. Now go read a book, and make up your own mind. ” Why the Left Hates America” – Dan Flynn, is one of the best I have read lately.

]]> By: Activist http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/comment-page-2/#comment-173332 Activist Mon, 01 Jan 2007 23:55:11 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/#comment-173332 J Scott: I am not insane. On the contrary. You need to go back and read my post again. I NEVER said that we weren't attacked under President Bush's watch, what I said was we have been attacked "less" under President Bush's watch. You libs are all alike. You can't read. I don't advocate that 9-11-2001 happened under Clinton's watch. If he had been President then, it would have. The terrorist were going to do it no matter who was in office. But since then (a fact that all libs ignore), innocent civilians have not been attacked on US soil (including embassies around the world). I love taking you libs to school. The US SOLDIERS are being attacked by terrorist, but civilians in the home land are safe. Where did you get this information, "the number of attacks increased worldwide........but the US stopped realising the report because it was too embarassing"? Where did that come from? If you omit terrorist attacks against our armed soldiers in Iraq, I think your statement is wishful thinking. I agree, I would love to have OBL behind bars, or in a box. Last thing for you, why can't you libs get it through your thick skulls, that the UN thought that Iraq was a threat (harboing terrorist Alqueda camps within it's territorial boundries) that is why they issued like 19 different slaps on the wrist. The CIA (democrat secretary) thought that Iraq was a threat, The other nations thought that Iraq was a threat, that is why they joined the coalition. And lastly (now pay attention) MOST ELECTED DEMOCRATS IN DC thought that Iraq was a threat and voted for the was based on the same information that President George Bush had (Upper case intentional)at the time. Anything else I can do for you? Please don't confuse FACT with wishful thinking. J Scott: I am not insane. On the contrary. You need to go back and read my post again. I NEVER said that we weren’t attacked under President Bush’s watch, what I said was we have been attacked “less” under President Bush’s watch.
You libs are all alike. You can’t read. I don’t advocate that 9-11-2001 happened under Clinton’s watch. If he had been President then, it would have. The terrorist were going to do it no matter who was in office. But since then (a fact that all libs ignore), innocent civilians have not been attacked on US soil (including embassies around the world).
I love taking you libs to school. The US SOLDIERS are being attacked by terrorist, but civilians in the home land are safe.
Where did you get this information, “the number of attacks increased worldwide……..but the US stopped realising the report because it was too embarassing”? Where did that come from? If you omit terrorist attacks against our armed soldiers in Iraq, I think your statement is wishful thinking. I agree, I would love to have OBL behind bars, or in a box.
Last thing for you, why can’t you libs get it through your thick skulls, that the UN thought that Iraq was a threat (harboing terrorist Alqueda camps within it’s territorial boundries) that is why they issued like 19 different slaps on the wrist. The CIA (democrat secretary) thought that Iraq was a threat, The other nations thought that Iraq was a threat, that is why they joined the coalition. And lastly (now pay attention) MOST ELECTED DEMOCRATS IN DC thought that Iraq was a threat and voted for the was based on the same information that President George Bush had (Upper case intentional)at the time. Anything else I can do for you? Please don’t confuse FACT with wishful thinking.

]]> By: Eve http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/comment-page-2/#comment-173203 Eve Mon, 01 Jan 2007 21:02:22 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/#comment-173203 It's happening in Denmark, too - I often get post sent from Australia, only to find an end has been torn off and the letters have been handled. And it's merely harmless mail - letters from friends and family. It's not just the US. :| It’s happening in Denmark, too – I often get post sent from Australia, only to find an end has been torn off and the letters have been handled. And it’s merely harmless mail – letters from friends and family.

It’s not just the US. :|

]]> By: Infragable Crunk http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/comment-page-2/#comment-173078 Infragable Crunk Mon, 01 Jan 2007 19:19:01 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/12/30/your-mail-is-officially-not-safe/#comment-173078 Activist, Either your just trolling or you have the mind of a child. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and suspect you of trolling. If your not, then you need to back to college and get a real education. Learn to think properly. If you follow your logic, because we haven't been atacked Bush is doing his job in makeing us safe. Ok, then if we follow that logic on other things, "After Clinton left office we were attacked by terrorists, removeing Clinton made the nation weaker and was casued for the 9/11 incident. Republicans caused 9/11 by voteing Bush in." There isn't that logic fun? You can apply it all sorts of ways! Activist,

Either your just trolling or you have the mind of a child. I’m going to give you the benefit of the doubt and suspect you of trolling.

If your not, then you need to back to college and get a real education. Learn to think properly. If you follow your logic, because we haven’t been atacked Bush is doing his job in makeing us safe. Ok, then if we follow that logic on other things, “After Clinton left office we were attacked by terrorists, removeing Clinton made the nation weaker and was casued for the 9/11 incident. Republicans caused 9/11 by voteing Bush in.” There isn’t that logic fun? You can apply it all sorts of ways!

]]>