Conservative Dem Kirsten Gillibrand Picked For Hillary’s Seat

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in Hillary, New York, Senate

skitched-20090123-093941

What a difference a day makes…

ALBANY – Gov. Paterson, defying the liberal wing of his Democratic Party, has chosen little-known, NRA-backed, upstate Congresswoman Kirsten Gillibrand to succeed Hillary Rodham Clinton as New York’s junior senator, it was learned last night.

The surprising – and, for many Democrats shocking – decision to pick the conservative Gillibrand, 42, from Hudson in Columbia County, was disclosed by the governor in calls to party officials and some members of the state’s congressional delegation, many of whom said they were unhappy with the selection, sources said.

Gillibrand, a mother of two occasionally resented by colleagues for being an aggressive self-promoter, was strongly backed for the post by Charles Schumer, the state’s senior senator, who said a woman and an upstater was needed on next year’s ticket.

This pick seems to make more sense than Kennedy because a conservative Dem will be more in line with Hillary’s centrist politics. Also, the fact that it’s ruffled some feathers in Manhattan isn’t the worst thing in the world.

More as it develops…


This entry was posted on Friday, January 23rd, 2009 and is filed under Hillary, New York, Senate. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Conservative Dem Kirsten Gillibrand Picked For Hillary’s Seat”

  1. John Burke Says:

    Justin — Gillibrand is not in any possible meaning of the word a “conservative.” That’s the New York Post’s Fred Dicker making mischief by tagging her with that label and positioning it as Paterson “defying the liberal wing” of the Democratic Party.

    As far as I can see in dozens of news stories, a handful of liberal Democrats have gone on record opposing her appointment. But she has strong support from both Schumer and Clinton, not to mention Paterson. Are they not in the “liberal wing?”

    Gillibrand has voted as a moderate, a centrist on some issues. She’s a member of the Blue Dog Coalition. Her non-liberal stands and votes in the House have mainly been about taxes and budgets. She voted against the Wall Street bailout. Given the daily torrent of criticism of that from liberals, what’s the matter with that?

    And she’s pro-gun rights. If she weren’t, she never would have been elected in a rock-ribbed Republican upstate district where every other voter is a hunter.

    As a Senator representing the whole state and needing the support of the statewide Democrtaic Party, I suspect she’ll shift a bit on some issues. She’ll certainly be as staunch an Obama supporter as anyone in the Senate.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: