(VIDEO) Goldman Vet Sparks Conflict On Hill

By American News Project | Related entries in News

This is Lagan from ANP…

Senator Reid says he will “move forward” on nomination of Gary Gensler despite hold by Senator Sanders.



Barack Obama’s plan to name yet another Goldman Sachs alum to his economic team is proving too much for Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT). Sanders put a hold on the nomination of Gary Gensler to head the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, effectively stopping the nomination process in its tracks. Sanders says Gensler, who spent 17 years at Goldman Sachs and then joined the Treasury Department under Bill Clinton, played too big a role in deregulating derivatives in the 90s’ to be trusted to reregulate the market now.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), however, has told ANP that he plans “move forward” with Gensler’s nomination despite Sanders’ hold. To Christopher Hayes, Washington editor of The Nation Magazine, the Majority Leader’s defense of Gensler and Goldman is a disturbing indication that it may be business as usual on the Hill when it comes to meaningful regulation on Wall Street.


This entry was posted on Thursday, April 2nd, 2009 and is filed under News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “(VIDEO) Goldman Vet Sparks Conflict On Hill”

  1. TerenceC Says:

    I wouldn’t count on business as usual – this guy has a reputation as an absolute shark. He’ll be responsible for overseeing an area that he has intimate knowledge of – he’s very well qualified for the post. From “Wiki”

    The stated mission of the CFTC is to protect market users and the public from fraud, manipulation, and abusive practices related to the sale of commodity and financial futures and options, and to foster open, competitive, and financially sound futures and option markets.

    Let’s just hope he’s a fox that can be trusted to protect the hens in the hen house.

  2. ExiledIndependent Says:

    Whoa whoa whoa–something that happened during the Clinton administration helped cause the current economic mess. Butbutbut…he was a Democrat. That’s simply not possible, right? And now we have Justin claiming that Bush wasn’t a fiscal conservative. The world has turned upside down.

    Could it possibly, *possibly* be that a genuinely fiscally conservative approach might bet better than what we’ve dealt with the past 16 years?

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: