Open Primaries Movement Gains Momentum

By Nancy Hanks | Related entries in News

The victory in California for independent voters with Proposition 14 has strengthened the movement for open primaries around the country:

Arizonans should watch closely (The Arizona Republic) Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, California’s outgoing Republican governor, readily acknowledged in a news conference that the goal is to reduce the power of political parties: “We wanted to have the politicians be public servants and not party servants.” He touted open primaries as a way to keep politicians from getting “stuck in their ideological corners.”

In Our View: One More Top Two – Washington’s system for primary voting is starting to catch on elsewhere (The Columbian – WA)

EDITORIAL: Watch this California experiment: State’s move to an open primary might reveal what works, what doesn’t (The Buffalo News, printed on But it is a big step with a noble purpose. New York should watch and learn.

House backs open primary elections for 2011 (Capitol News Bureau, Louisiana Politics Blog, By JORDAN BLUM, Advocate Capitol News Bureau)

For more news for independent voters, see The Hankster

This entry was posted on Wednesday, June 16th, 2010 and is filed under News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

11 Responses to “Open Primaries Movement Gains Momentum”

  1. kranky kritter Says:

    Christie has Palin beat!

    Since there’s no place else to really place this here, I am officially renewing my request to have an open thread every Friday or Monday. Sort of a “what’s on your mind?” thing,

    Anyway, I’d like to point out this Chris Christie video.

    Here’s a conservative with real common sense substance. He’s fat and white and male, not pretty and youthful and female. And yet he has it ALL over Sara Palin. Caught a few minutes of Palin last night with Larry King, and more than ever, there is just NOTHING to her. Her entire act if a substance-free schtick based on the notion that Obama is wrong about everything, and everything bad is his fault. Christie OTOH is speaking plain truth we need to hear.

    FWIW, I think all states should have open primaries. Unconvinced of the merits of a top 2 run-off at the final stage though.

  2. Nicholas R. Goebel Says:

    I think that although the Top Two Primary Reform is far from perfect, it is at least a step in the right direction. Thank you to Donklephant for revealing that this reform is not perfect.

    My take on how it could be improved with instant runoff:

  3. Tweets that mention Donklephant » Blog Archive » Open Primaries Movement Gains Momentum -- Says:

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Justin Gardner, Donklephant. Donklephant said: DONKLEPHANT: Open Primaries Movement Gains Momentum [...]

  4. the Word Says:

    We wanted to have the politicians be public servants and not party servants.

    Schwarzenegger or his speechwriter just trumped everyone in the party. If only it were true.

  5. Nancy Hanks Says:

    the Word — lol! yes indeed and it will take a lot more work to make it true!

    kranky – i’ll put up an open thread tomorrow if justin doesn’t… good idea!

  6. Justin Gardner Says:

    Nancy, go for it! I think open threads would be a good way to get some more conversations going.

  7. the Word Says:

    I’m reminded of what John Anderson a man with intellect and character (a Republican from a long way back) He was asked if he felt like a spoiler in 1980. His response, “What’s to spoil?”

  8. Nancy Hanks Says:


  9. Bill Gish Says:

    I live in Louisiana where we had an open primary system for many years. I loved it. In races for lesser offices it minimizes the undue influence of the parties. For major races everyone knows who the main party candidates are and there is very little difference from the two horse races you have everywhere else.

    An added benefit is that it injects a little more democracy in states where on party is overwhelmingly dominant. You don’t just have a coronation by the party bigwigs.

  10. jjray Says:

    If I understand the open primary concept correctly, a voter does not have to be registered with a particular party to vote in that party’s primary. That’s a problem when there is a uncontested primary in one party. Why? It frees voters from the uncontested primary to cross over and vote in an opposing primary for the weaker candidate. Witness the fiasco in democratic senatorial primary in SC. I’m not a huge fan of political parties but open primaries seem to open up potential abuse for political operatives.

  11. Nancy Hanks Says:

    jjray — in the case of Prop 14 in California, it’s a “top two” primary where all the candidates are on the same ballot and all the voters, regardless of party, can vote for whomever they want. The top two vote-getters then go to a run-off election. Candidates are allowed to put their party affiliation if they want. This is similar to a nonpartisan race, but there is a run-off of the top two instead of the candidate with the most votes automatically gaining office.

    There are many ways to structure elections. The independents who were backing Prop 14 were concerned about the exclusion of 20% of the electorate. This adds up nationally — 40 % of the American electorate chooses not to affiliate with parties. That figure would no doubt be higher if all states had open primaries because a lot of people register into a party in order to be able to vote in the decisive round of voting, which in many states and municipalities like NYC is the primary. There is a 5-1 ratio of Dem registered voters in NYC, so it is indeed a one-party town where the Dem bigwigs have coronations for City Council, as Bill Gish notes above. Because NY has fusion voting, where candidates are allowed to run on more than one ballot line, the NYC Independence Party has been the margin of victory in the past 3 mayoral elections. The NYC IP supports nonpartisan elections.

Leave a Reply


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.

Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.

One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.

Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.

Related Posts: